<< Back
Pitney Bowes Comments on Proxy Advisory Firm Recommendation
Urges Shareholders to Vote FOR Pitney Bowes’ Eight Director Nominees as well as
Strongly Disagrees with ISS’ Recommendation; Believes that it Would Result in an Extreme and Destabilizing Level of Change
We strongly disagree with ISS’ voting recommendation, which we believe would result in an extreme and destabilizing level of change at
- “…it is clear that PBI has in fact undergone significant transformation over the past decade…the leadership team should be given credit for attempting to refocus.”
- “PBI trimmed and refocused legacy operations as part of the process, and it is not clear that the dissident’s view on the correct strategy for Presort and SendTech is more compelling than that of incumbent leadership.”
Furthermore, ISS commended the Board’s corporate governance, including its Board refreshment program, saying2:
- "There are few major controversies with the headline corporate governance structure.”
- “…the board deserves credit for maintaining a regular refreshment program since 2015...”
- “The board implicitly recognized the need for change when it announced refreshment initiatives in March…”
Over the past decade,
Pitney Bowes has already implemented significant changes to the Board. Our recommended director nominees include a strong, engaged, and diverse set of directors, with a balanced mix of experience, skills, leadership expertise, and new perspectives. If our recommended director nominees (includingKatie May ) are elected, our Board will be 88.9% independent and 66.7% diverse, with an average tenure of approximately 5.3 years. Pitney Bowes’ recent Board refreshments include:- Electing new directors
Darrell Thomas andSteven D. Brill to the Board. - Supporting the election of Hestia director nominee
Katie May at the 2023 Annual Meeting. - Electing
Robert M. Dutkowsky to succeedMichael I. Roth as Non-Executive Chairman. - Announcing that
Michael I. Roth ,S. Douglas Hutcheson , andDavid L. Shedlarz will not stand for re-election.
- Electing new directors
- If shareholders were to follow ISS’ recommendation, Pitney Bowes’ Board would be destabilized. Six of nine directors would have joined the Board this year, the average tenure of the non-executive directors would be ~one year, and the longest tenure of the non-executive directors would be five years.
Pitney Bowes would lose its Chair of the Board, Chair of the Governance Committee, and Chair of the Executive Compensation Committee. This means that every single Committee Chair and Board Chair would be new to the role as of the Annual Meeting. Moreover, we believe Hestia’s nominees (with the exception ofKatie May ) lack the necessary experience and skills to execute Pitney Bowes’ strategy and enhance long-term value for shareholders.
- We are not satisfied with our TSR, either. That said, in its analysis ISS concedes that
Pitney Bowes actually outperformed its peer median on a three-year trailing basis by 18.3%. ISS fails to take into account that our TSR has been dragged down in recent years due to the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruptions andChina lock-down – which affectedPitney Bowes disproportionally due to our significant international operations, particularly inChina . As the world normalizes slowly, we fully expect our TSR to recover to previous levels.
- Our independent directors hold management accountable. ISS’ criticism that
Mr. Lautenbach ,Mr. Dutkowsky , andMs. Sanford decades ago worked at IBM fails to appreciate that IBM was an organization with around 450,000 employees at the time. At no time didMr. Lautenbach ,Mr. Dutkowsky , andMs. Sanford work together at IBM, nor did they report to one another. And our new ChairmanMr. Dutkowsky has a proven track record of terminating underperforming CEOs, including ex-IBM employees.
The Board believes that its eight director nominees and Hestia nominee
VOTE THE GOLD PROXY CARD TODAY FOR ALL PITNEY BOWES’ RECOMMENDED DIRECTOR NOMINEES
The Board urges all shareholders to vote “FOR” all the nominees recommended by the Pitney Bowes Board (all eight Company nominees and the recommended Hestia nominee,
Vote Online Go to the website identified on the enclosed GOLD proxy card or voting instruction form. |
Vote by Mail If you received your Annual Meeting material by mail, you also may choose to grant your proxy by completing, signing, dating, and returning the enclosed GOLD proxy card. |
For more information about the 2023 Annual Meeting, please visit: www.VoteforPitneyBowes.com. Shareholders who have any questions or need assistance voting may contact the Company’s proxy solicitor,
About
Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains “forward-looking statements” about the Company’s expected or potential future business and financial performance. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about future revenue and earnings guidance and future events or conditions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. In particular, we continue to navigate the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic (Covid-19) as well as the risk of a global recession, and the effects that they may have on our and our clients’ business. Other factors which could cause future financial performance to differ materially from expectations, and which may also be exacerbated by Covid-19 or the risk of a global recession or a negative change in the economy, include, without limitation, declining physical mail volumes; changes in postal regulations or the operations and financial health of posts in the
Important Additional Information and Where to Find It
1 Permission to use quotations neither sought nor obtained.
2 Permission to use quotations neither sought nor obtained.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230427005593/en/
Editorial -
Chief Communications Officer
203.351.6785
Financial -
VP, Investor Relations
203.614.1092
Senior Manager, Investor Relations
203.351.7639
Source: